Hospitals Youtubing Live Operations

NY Times has a disturbing article on how hospitals to stay competitive in marketing themselves have adopted videoing and showcasing their patients' operations in real time.

Am I the only one who is super freaked out by this?

There are plenty of ethical issues tangled with these practices. Firstly, how are the patients consenting to this form of violation of their privacies? Are they getting paid, receiving discounts on their medical bills, or simply just eager for the notoriety gained at Youtube by their audacious videos? Secondly, how are the hospitals providing adequate care when they are parading their patients on the internet heavily sedated undergoing at times life-threatening surgeries? 

What happens if a patient dies on the table? Are we then rewarded by watching death live on the internet? How is that NOT going against the grain of proper social norms?

I'm also concerned why the insurance companies who leap at the chance to say no to critical procedures for ill patients are not vilifying this form of obscene violation? Are they getting a cut of the deal as well?

Most certainly, in my opinion, the hospitals need to cease exploiting their patients misfortunes for free publicity. By condoning these dehumanizing practices, we are one small step away from watching people die on tv. 

More Closed Doors Confession

Another military personnel came forth declaring the US military (she confessed to being an active participant) used abusive practices to coerce suspects into signing confessions. 

According to her interview with CNN, she exposed a known terrorist suspect who was imprisoned for seven years, repeatedly and regularly exposed to violent beatings and dehumanizing activities to a point where he willingly signed a confession stating he was a terror suspect. However now he is living safely in his own country after being fully exonerated by the US government.

The military woman further stated that she actually believed he was the enemy and at her own volition engaged in carrying out abusive actions against him only to find out that he was innocent of all charges. Now she feels compelled to state the truth about US's not so discreet manner of abusing suspects in prison. 

Her new account of torture in US prisons bags the questions what form of intelligence does United States utilize to flag and capture terrorists suspects? 

FBI Foiled Future Jihad Strike in NY

Today on AC360, Anderson Cooper interviewed a Repulican congressman from NY on the capture of alleged terrorists in NY. The congressman in his limited knowledge of the men kept on emphasizing several times that they are all MUSLIMS. He must have repeated the terrorists' religion at every third word. Obviously, one of the men being of Afghan descent and the other three being recent converts of Islam while in prison struck the nail on their coffins. Even after acknowledging that he had little information of the entire event, he kept on highlighting that they were MUSLIMS  and had supposedly planned on attacking a synagogue. 

The three men who converted into Islam in prison interests me the most. Which prison? Why were they there in the first place? Who are these men? What prompted them to convert? And how do newly converts automatically raise their arms in violence to protect their religion? 

Mass Rape in Liberia

Nicholas Kristof's NY Times column today exposes the cultural acceptance of rape in Liberia long after the war is over. He recounts the cases of minor girls who have been raped and now living in shelters for rape survivors. The inspirational part of his piece is the young Jackie declaring that she wants to one day become the president of Liberia and build houses for abused girls.

The most chillingly aspect of his piece is the thought that Liberian men have become conditioned to not regard rape as an awful act of brute power overcoming helplessness. Instead according to Kristof, when men feel like sex they just overcome the nearest girl. Forceful sex with unwilling partners isnt a terrible deed for Liberian men, it is a customary act of asserting and satisfying their power and sexual needs respectively. Unfortunately, the public health system does not seem capable to cater to rape victims. Many cases are transferred to the main hospital in Monrovia to adequately provide halthcare facilities. Hence in remote regions, raped victims are often left untreated which undoubtedly leads to sever health complications.

This form of social deconstruction of rape will wreck havoc for the females' movement and for their security. The prospect of generations of females being raped at minor ages is highly plausible. How many of them are like Jackie? How many of them have the courage and the determination to overcome the injustices and abuses imposed upon them? How many of them can have hopes for positive futures?

Iran First

Today Iran tried out a new short-range missile. Instinctively, the media started speculating how Iran's action affects the Middles East question and to Israel's security. I caught a few shows replaying the video of the missile shooting across the horizon with the ominous voice in the background stating the missile was capable of reaching Israel from Iran. Lately, editorials in top news sites have already started commenting on Iran's non-committal stance in response to President Obama's overtures of efficient and effective candid discussion between the two countries. The media has been portraying Iran as aloof, less eager thereby less keen, reluctant, and uninterested to actively resolve the conflict and tension spawned between the two nations and carefully nurtured by the Bush'a administration. When the question of Iran's right to bear arms sprouts, many highlight the hypocrisy of Israel possessing arms yet Iran being censured for talking about being a participant of the nuclear arms race. As one columnist in the NY Times stated prior to Israeli Prime Minister's Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington, it would be quite a hypocrisy on United States's behalf to admonish Iran for seeking nuclear arms while condoning Israel's cache of such weaponry. Yet, there we had President Obama, with PM Netanyahu adjacent to him, assert Iran possessing any forms of nuclear arsenal will be the harbinger of the end of days. A few days later Iran went ahead and carried out a missile.

It seems the more the West attempts to admonish, castigate, or simply frighten Iran to back down, the more Iran in a fit of teenage rebellion does the opposite. Perhaps, instead of publicly denouncing Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Obama administration can proactively reach out across borders and bring Iranian diplomats to the table behind closed doors. Or better yet, perhaps instead of massaging Israel by publicly vilifying Iran's actions, they can encourage a progressive and effective engagement among the three nations. 

Bangladesh's First Harassment Case?

Today I read about the epic court decision overturning a previous decision where victims of a sexual harassment case by a professor at Jahannigar University were expelled from their school and the perpetrator was fully exonerated. Yet today the court decided that the previous decision was erroneous, summoned a new investigation into evidence of wrongdoing by the University.

A couple of years ago, a few female students from said University filed a sexual harassment case  against one of their professors. However, their search for justice was thwarted by the overwhelming social sympathy for the male figure. In other words, the legal system penalized the female victims for voicing the misconduct of their professor, while rewarding and condoning the professor's inappropriate behavior by pardoning him. 

This legal case clearly delineats the patriarchal society which we still inhabit. Men get away doing worse things, while females are hindered and censured for standing up for themselves and highlighting the fallacies of their male counterparts. But, perhaps, with the overturning of the previous court's decision and the new inquiry into the University's actions and the victims' case can be used to crack the patriarchal ceiling. 

Females, especially victims, need a secure and safe platform to speak out against their perpetrators. The perpetrators of crimes must be taken to court and lawfully tried in order to thwart future smilar accidents occuring, and display the supreme fact that justice is indeed blind, and perpetrators must pay for their crimes. 

Jahangirnagar University Students Win Landmark Victory on Sexual Harassment Case

My friend emailed this to me today ----

High Court Holds Illegal University Decisions to Exonerate Teacher of Charges, Expel StudentsDirects Fresh Inquiry based on New Sexual Harassment GuidelinesSummaryThe High Court gave a landmark judgment today in the first application of its Sexual Harassment Guidelines pronounced on 14 May.One year ago, in May 2008, four women students at Jahangirnagar University made complaints of serial sexual harassment against their teacher and the Chairperson of the Drama Department, Sanowar Hossain Sunny. The University appointed three separate inquiry committees, which examined witnesses and issued reports with clear findings against the teacher. During this period, the students continued to face threats and harassment. In September 2008, the University announced that Sunny was 'exonerated of all charges of sexual harassment as they had not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt'. Later the University also proceeded to pass orders of temporary expulsion against four of the women complainants, and two male students who had given evidence in their favour.Prof Sirajul Islam Chowdhury and others filed a public interest petition challenging the University's decision and actions. Later the victim-complainants and the two other students also became parties to the petition (Prof Sirajul Islam and others v Jahangirnagar University and others Writ Petition 9414 of 2008).Today the High Court held that the decisions taken by the University to exonerate Sunny on the one hand, and to expel the students on the other, were both without lawful authority. It also directed the University to hold a fresh inquiry into the incident, with independent persons, on the basis of the new Guidelines on Sexual Harassment pronounced in BNWLA v Bangladesh . Citing judgments of the Supreme Courts of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan, the Court held that corroboration was not always required to prove allegations of sexual violence, and further that the standard of 'beyond a reasonable doubt' could not be applicable in cases of this nature, relating to disciplinary inquiries regarding allegations of sexual harassment. The Court also noted that Jahangirnagar University authorities had failed 'for reasons best known to themselves' to adopt their own guidelines on sexual harassment, and therefore in the absence of any applicable law, the High Court's new guidelines should be applied to any fresh inquiry.A Division Bench comprising Justice Syed Mahmud Hossain and Justice Quamrul Islam Siddiqi passed the judgment today.The writ petition was filed by eminent citizens Prof. Sirajul Islam Chowdhury and Kamal Lohani, and three human rights organisations, Ain o Salish Kendra, Nijera Kori and Kormojibi Nari.[1] Four women students of Jahagirnagar University who had made complaints of sexual harassment, and two others who gave evidence, were also joined as petitioners during the course of the hearing.Sara Hossain, with Ramzan Ali Sikder, Ainun Nahar Lipi and Abantee Nurul appeared for the public interest petitioners. Ruhul Quddus Babu appeared for the students.BackgroundComplaints: In May 2008, four women students submitted written complaints of serial sexual harassment against Asst Prof Sanowar Hossain Sunny of the Drama and Dramatic Theory Department. The University set up a preliminary inquiry committee, and then a further verification committee both of which made prima facie findings against the teacher. On consideration of their reports, the Syndicate established a Full Inquiry Committee under Section 44 of the Jahangirnagar University Act. This report was submitted to the Syndicate which passed a decision in September to exonerate the said teacher of all charges of sexual harassment on the ground that in the absence of eyewitnesses these had not been 'proved beyond reasonable doubt'. This decision was passed despite clear findings by each Inquiry Committee against the teacher, including findings by the Final Inquiry Committee of misconduct against the teacher, and that his behaviour was 'wholly improper and unbefitting of a teacher' and recommending action against him. The University, despite having powers to do so, had never suspended the teacher pending inquiry.Appeals filed by the students to the Chancellor of the University, also the President of the country, went unheeded.Expulsion and Threats: In October, the University then reinstated the teacher. Following his return to the campus, and an altercation with students, the accused teacher made a complaint against six students (two of whom were among the women who had made complaints against him and two of whom were male students who had given evidence against him). The Syndicate moved the same day to pass orders of temporary expulsion on these six students. A section of the Jahagirnagar University Teachers Association then held processions and meetings demanding the immediate expulsion of the students, and refused to hold classes unless action was taken. Some of these teachers were at the same time involved in the disciplinary proceedings against the students.During this entire period, the victim complainants and others witnesses had been subjected to repeated threats and warned that unless they stopped pursuing their claims against the teacher, they would face dire consequences. These threats were reported to the University Authorities but no action was taken.High Court Orders: On 27 October, the High Court issued a Rule Nisi on the University and also stayed the orders of temporary expulsion passed on the students. It asked Jahangirnagar University Authorities to show cause among others as to why its to exonerate Sanower Hossain Sunny should not be declared to be without lawful authority and why a fresh inquiry should not be held into the matter. It also stayed operation of the orders of the Syndicate suspending six students of the University including four of the women who had originally made complaints against this teacher and two other who had given evidence against him.The University in its response to the Court stated that it had acted with 'due process' and justified the action taken against the student victims of sexual harassment. As a result of the High Court's orders, it submitted copies of the reports of the three Inquiry Committees to the Court.
Sexual Harassment Guidelines: It should be noted that calls for formulation of Guidelines on Sexual Harassment had first come from students and teachers of Jahagirnagar University, in the wake of earlier incidents of serial sexual harassment, from more than ten years ago, involving both teachers and students as perpetrators. Although the JU Syndicate had mandated the framing of such Guidelines, it ultimately failed to adopt these Guidelines.In the meantime, in 2008, the University Grants Commission, in the context of the new reports of sexual harassment surfacing at JU and Dhaka University, and in response to calls from women's organisations, including Bangladesh Mohila Porishod, set up a drafting committee to prepare new Guidelines. This Committee drew heavily on the Jahangirnagar draft, and revised it following consultations with civil society organisations and academics. But ultimately the Education Ministry failed to adopt the Guidelines the decision. Earlier this month, it held that it would not proceed with the UGC guidelines, but instead called on each University to frame its own rules and regulations - leaving victims of sexual harassment with no effective redress. In this context, the High Court's Guidelines in Bangladesh National Women Lawyers Association v Bangladesh, pronounced on 14 May 2009, have filled a much needed gap in the law, and today's judgment shows how they can be immediately utilised to open up new possibilities for legal protection and also to hold authorities responsible for creating a violence free educational environment.For further information, please contactSara Hossain, 01713 031828, sarahossain@gmail.comRuhul Quddus, 01711 434891[1] Represented by Sultana Kamal, ED, ASK, Khushi Kabir, Coordinator, Nijera Kori and Shirin Akhter, President KN respectively.